Project

General

Profile

Actions

User story #2950

closed

Improve directive management display

Added by Jean VILVER over 11 years ago. Updated almost 11 years ago.

Status:
Released
Priority:
N/A
Assignee:
Nicolas PERRON
Category:
Web - UI & UX
Target version:
UX impact:
Suggestion strength:
User visibility:
Effort required:
Name check:
Fix check:
Regression:

Files


Subtasks 3 (0 open3 closed)

User story #3319: Change fieldset display into a section oneReleased2013-02-26Actions
User story #3320: change the help display styleReleased2013-02-26Actions
User story #3325: Improve item display in directive forms.Released2013-02-27Actions

Updated by Jean VILVER over 11 years ago

Attached, a proposition for the directivement management view and the create directive popup view.

Actions #2

Updated by Jean VILVER over 11 years ago

Jean VILVER wrote:

Attached, a proposition for the directivement management view and the create directive popup view.

The main purpose of those propositions is to have a clearer workflow when creating and watching directives, and to standardize the way we deal with rudder objects (rules, techniques, directives, etc.).

Actions #3

Updated by Nicolas PERRON over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.5.0~beta1 to 2.5.0~rc1
Actions #4

Updated by François ARMAND over 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from 2.5.0~rc1 to 2.6.0~beta1
Actions #5

Updated by François ARMAND about 11 years ago

  • Assignee set to Jonathan CLARKE
  • Target version changed from 2.6.0~beta1 to Ideas (not version specific)

That proposition is just a starting point, there is a lot of blured things to make clearer.

For example, you can't save a directive if you don't have configured its parameter (else, you're going to end-up with an invalid one).

Else, there is a lot of intersting things here: having the tree-view with Techniques in the add pop-up is intersting. I'm not sur if the proposition is also to delete the tree view from the main directive screen, and I believe it would be a bad idea for now - or it suppose to have an other way of sorting Directives, like tags.

So... We need some guidance from our PO for that.

Updated by François ARMAND about 11 years ago

Updated proposition:

  • with header separation in place of fieldsets
  • with a different tab for Directive Edition
Actions #7

Updated by Arthur ANGLADE about 11 years ago

After discussing it, here are the points that will be changed :

  • header separation in place of fieldsets (#3319)
  • changing the help display style (#3320)
  • change the style of the "mandatory" fields, to make them more obvious
  • aligning the "labels" and "parameters" on a line, and not in the center.
Actions #8

Updated by Arthur ANGLADE about 11 years ago

Here are Jon's feedback :

  • there should be a way to separate fields/variables/groups by light lines, or light separations.
  • Help should be shortened by a [... more] link when it's too long.
  • Instead of tooltips, a div that is shown only on focus of the fields should be used.
  • List of items like (yes -no - don't change) should be displayed on a single line, instead of a column.
Actions #9

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Discussion to 12
  • Assignee changed from Jonathan CLARKE to Nicolas PERRON

#3353 is related to this ticket but should not have been set as a subtask.
All other subtasks are waiting to be merged so this ticket will soon be "pending release".

Actions #10

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Target version changed from Ideas (not version specific) to 2.6.0~beta1
Actions #11

Updated by Nicolas PERRON about 11 years ago

  • Status changed from 12 to Pending release
Actions #12

Updated by Jonathan CLARKE about 11 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending release to Released

This ticket has been addressed in version 2.6.0~beta1 of Rudder, which has just been released. Please see the changelog here: https://www.rudder-project.org/foswiki/System/Documentation:ChangeLog26.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF