Bug #2244
closed
Date of PT/PI/CR/Group archives is not valid
Description
Unless February 36th is a new kind of leap year (in the future)...
Files
Updated by François ARMAND about 12 years ago
Ah, silly you, of course that should be read "2012, February, 36th days of the year".
Or perhaps a developer misused "DD" in place of "dd" in a date format string...
Updated by François ARMAND about 12 years ago
- Status changed from 2 to In progress
Updated by François ARMAND about 12 years ago
- Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset 1dfcdf7865ba73c386bc664dd2d74c9cd632cfdc.
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE about 12 years ago
- Status changed from Pending technical review to Discussion
Looks OK to me, but didn't we decide to store the date format in one central place to avoid this kind of problem?
Updated by François ARMAND about 12 years ago
Well, here we have a date and time format, not only a date - but ok, its a really weak argument.
I believe I add a far better one when I choose to not use the standard date formatter, I just can't remember it now. Perhaps something to do with the ordering of the dates, but I'm not sure.
I let it open, and will come back to it if I don't find any good reason to not do so.
Updated by François ARMAND about 12 years ago
- Status changed from Discussion to In progress
Updated by François ARMAND about 12 years ago
- Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
Applied in changeset 52bb25bab04626437714fa37e202912b6d9f6dad.
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 12 years ago
- Status changed from Pending technical review to Released
This loooks valid, thank you Francois !