User story (meta) #2393
The hosts edition technique should warn the user about its behaviour
| Status: | Released | Start date: | 2012-03-28 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | 1 | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | % Done: | 100% |
||
| Category: | Techniques - Others | |||
| Target version: | 2.3.7 | |||
| Needs translating: | No |
Description
The hosts edition technique should warn the user about the fact that if one IP is defined several times with different hosts, the corresponding IP defined in the technique will be used as a reference and will overwrite all the others
Associated revisions
Refs #2393: The hosts configuration technique now warns the user about its behavior, especially about the fact that multiple IPs with the same host will be deleted and replaced with the defined host if requested
Fixes #2393: The hosts configuration technique now warns the user about its behavior, especially about the fact that multiple IPs with the same host will be deleted and replaced with the defined host if requested
Merge branch 'branches/rudder/2.3'
- branches/rudder/2.3:
Fixes #2393: The hosts configuration technique now warns the user about its behavior, especially about the fact that multiple IPs with the same host will be deleted and replaced with the defined host if requested
Fixes #2387: The hosts configuration technique now permits the user to redefine a host associated to an IP without adding another conflicting
Conflicts:
techniques/systemSettings/networking/hostsConfiguration/1.0/metadata.xml
History
#1
Updated by Matthieu CERDA about 1 year ago
- Status changed from In progress to Pending technical review
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset commit:d751c19cc7e98bd7b8c681d02b15f1da7d32655f.
#2
Updated by Matthieu CERDA about 1 year ago
This bug fix has been backported to Rudder 2.3
#3
Updated by Matthieu CERDA about 1 year ago
- Target version changed from 2.4.0~alpha7 to 2.3.7
#4
Updated by Nicolas CHARLES about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Pending technical review to Pending functional review
This looks valid, thank you Matthieu
#5
Updated by Jonathan CLARKE about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Pending functional review to Released